ANALISIS PENGARUH GAYA GEMPA TIDAK SERAGAM TERHADAP RESPONS STRUKTUR JEMBATAN GANTUNG

Putri Kumala Sari, Yolla Fransiska

Abstract


Bridges are essential infrastructures that serve to connect two regions separated by various geographical conditions. Among the various types of bridges, suspension bridges are commonly used for long-span applications. The main structural components of a suspension bridge consist of the main cables and vertical suspenders. Due to their long spans, suspension bridges are susceptible to differential ground motions at each support, which may arise from varying soil conditions—this phenomenon is referred to as multi-support excitation. In this study, three types of analyses were conducted: static analysis, dynamic analysis under longitudinal seismic excitation, and dynamic analysis under transverse seismic excitation, using MIDAS Civil software. The soil conditions applied in all three analyses were assumed to be stiff soil at the left support and soft soil at the right support. The structural responses observed include internal forces and displacements. The seismic loads were defined using the time history method. The time history records were derived from the conversion of response spectra for the Bukittinggi region, considering both stiff and soft soil conditions. The results indicate that, in both longitudinal and transverse dynamic seismic analyses, the highest internal force values predominantly occurred at the support located in the soft soil area, except for moment values, which reached their maximum at the support in the stiff soil area. The maximum Dynamic Amplification Factor (DAF) in the longitudinal direction of the girder occurred at an element located at 0,25 of the span length on the right side, with a value of 2,621.

Keywords


multi support excitation, time history, dynamic amplification factor, midascivil

References


N. S. Nagose, ‘Analysis and Design of Suspension Cable Bridge’, Int J Res Appl Sci Eng Technol, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 1758–1763, May 2018, doi: 10.22214/ijraset.2018.5286.

A. Panchal, D. K. B. Parikh, and P. A. R. Darji, ‘Issue 02 JETIR (ISSN-2349-5162) J ETIR1702001 Journal of Emerging Technol ogies and Innovati ve Research’, 2017. [Online]. Available: www.jetir.org

S. Yadi, B. Suhendro, H. Priyosulistyo, and A. Aminullah, ‘Dynamic response of long-span bridges subjected to non-uniform excitation: a state-of-the-art review’, doi: 10.1051/matecconf/20192.

S. Sengupta, S. Kanike, and A. Dutta, ‘Numerical Analysis for Multi-Support Excitation of a Long Bridge with Tall Piers’, in Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering Computing, Civil-Comp Press, Aug. 2023, pp. 1–10. doi: 10.4203/ccc.6.11.2.

A. A. Meibodi, N. A. Alexander, J. A. Norman, and A. J. Crewe, ‘A theoretical and experimental exploration of the seismic dynamics of multi-span bridges’, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, vol. 18, no. 9, pp. 4275–4298, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s10518-020-00864-6.

Masrilayanti, A. Riza, K. Ruddy, and S. Zakpar, ‘Behaviour of cable-stayed bridge’s girder to multi-support excitation’, MATEC Web of Conferences, vol. 276, p. 01037, 2019, doi: 10.1051/matecconf/201927601037.

H. Ma, Z. Cao, X. Shi, and J. Zhou, ‘Dynamic amplification factor of shear force on bridge columns under impact load’, Shock and Vibration, vol. 2019, 2019, doi: 10.1155/2019/9483246.

P. Azimi and M. Yazdani, ‘Calculation of Dynamic Amplification Factor for Railway Concrete and Masonry Arch Bridges Subjected to High-speed Trains’, Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 876–890, 2022, doi: 10.3311/PPci.19494.

A. Prayoga Nasution, P. Basenda Tarigan, R. Kurniawan, and A. Meutia Rosario, ‘Analisis Dynamic Amplification Factor (DAF) pada Jembatan Sp Gunung Kemala-Sanggi Rangka Baja dengan Metoda Analisis Respons Spektrum’, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://journal.itera.ac.id/index.php/jipad/

R. Imani, R. Nasmirayanti, U. D. Arman, and A. Sari, ‘KINERJA SEISMIK STRUKTUR PASCAGEMPA’, Rang Teknik Journal, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 151–155, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.31869/rtj.v5i1.2974.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30630/jipr.20.2.393

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.